National Center for State Courts

 

Improving Justice through Leadership
and Service to the Courts

     

  

 

 Future Trends in State Courts
Articles

 

                       

Consortium for Language Access in the Courts


Each year (beginning in 1994) the National Center for State Courts publishes a report now entitled "Future Trends in State Courts." The purpose of this report is to support the strategic planning efforts in the court community.   Each publication contains several articles written by NCSC staff and court experts from around the country. Individual Future Trends articles published since 2001 that relate to this topic are listed to below.


Trends 2009

Carola E. Green and Wanda Romberger.  Leveraging Technology to Meet the Need for Interpreters.  State courts, faced with the steadily increasing necessity to provide interpreting services, are identifying innovative uses of technology to maximize existing interpreter resources, while remaining fiscally responsible.

 

Trends 2008 Wanda Romberger.  Language Access Centers: A Win-Win Idea.  The creation of a central recruiting, training, testing, and scheduling center for providing foreign-language interpreters is not just a theory anymore.  Alaska has created its Language Interpreter Center under the auspices of the Alaska Immigration Justice Project, anidea that can be replicated by other courts.

 

Trends 2007 Wanda Romberger.  Interpreters in Civil Cases.  This article discusses the adoption of an interpreter program in state courts. The article looks at the details and provisions of this program and how it helps courts function more smoothly and how it helps non-natives to better understand court proceedings.

 

Trends 2006 Wanda Romberger and William E. Hewitt.  Wanted: Career Paths for Court Interpreters.  This article explains that a number of states are testing and certifying court interpreters.  Therefore, the courts must begin to consider improved service-utilization techniques for existing interpreter resources and provide incentives to entice new interpreters into the field.

Top Ten Trends.  Cultural Diversity: The Use of Court Interpreters.  This article discusses the need for qualified court interpreters in the courts cystem as a method to make the courts more effective in representing non-English speakers.

 

Trends 2005 Wanda Romberger and Madelynn Herman.  Court Interpreter Ethics Programs: Where We Are and Where We Should Be Going?  This article addresses the needs for court interpreter ethics programs, strategies for implementing such programs as well as information on existing court interpreter ethics programs.  

 

Trends 2004 Virginia Suveiu. The Growing Need for Qualified Court Interpreters. November 15, 2004.  This article from the 2004 Trends Report examines the growing need for qualified court interpreters, with an emphasis on what "qualified" interpretation means and what getting qualified interpreters may cost state courts.

 

Trends 2002 Wanda Romberger and Madelynn Herman.  Computer-Based Interpreter TestingThis article explains the computer-based interpreter testing in Texas.  It explains how it works as well as benefits of the testing model and plans for future changes.  

 

Trends 2000 Madelynn Herman and Dorothy Bryant. Language Interpreting in the Court. July 2000.  This article explains how "simultaneous telephonic interpreting" works, discusses Minnesota's approach to court interpretation, and presents the relative costs incurred by incorporating interpreter technology into the courts.  

Tom Munsterman.  Multi-Lingual Juries.  July 2000.  This article discusses the increase in multilingual juries.  It focuses on New Mexico's state constitution and how it addresses the need for a standard language among jurists.  

 

Date Last Modified: December 15, 2011

Top     

Future Trends in State Courts is a product of  Knowledge and Information Services Office.


Knowledge and Information Services
Phone (800) 616-6164
National Center for State Courts

Questions or Comments - Submission Form

Copyright © 2011 The National Center for State Courts. All Rights Reserved.