National Center for State Courts

 

Improving Justice through Leadership
and Service to the Courts

     

  

Washington Mass Tort Survey

    

 

   

Mass Tort
Washington
Survey Results



Tracking and/or reporting of mass tort cases

State as a whole does not track mass torts. 

Top      

Definition of "mass tort"

None known.

Top      

Procedural rules

Rules do not single out mass tort cases; Civil Rule of Procedure 23(a) and (b) set forth class action requirements.

Top      

Statutes

None known.

Top      

Case law

None known.

Top      

Administrative orders

None known.

Top      

Interlocutory appeal

Same as for other civil cases. An appellate court can accept discretionary review of trial court’s interlocutory decisions pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 2.3.

Top      

Infrastructure: special dockets

Not statewide. At different times, individual courts have adopted tracks for pre-assigning complicated civil cases to individual judges, so that for each case a single judge hears both the pre-trial issues and the trial itself. These specialized civil tracks, however, are not necessarily limited to mass torts on the whole, as much as they are limited to any tort cases that might be particularly complicated and time-consuming.

Top      

Infrastructure: task forces, commissions, or other policy-level bodies

None known.

Top      

Case management

Not statewide. At times, individual courts have pre-assigned complicated civil cases (as described above), but not aware of any that have focused on mass tort cases.

Top      

Technology

Washington courts use the Judicial Information System (JIS) to automate and support court operations, and to maintain a statewide network connecting courts and partner criminal justice agencies to the JIS database.

GR 30, Electronic filing.

Electronic Filing Technical Standards for the Washington State Courts (November 7, 2003).

Access to Justice Technology Resources.

Top      

Last Modified: 8/29/2006 9:51:29 AM

Return to index      


Copyright 2006.   National Center for State Courts.  All Rights Reserved