|
Top
Thacker, Gerald.
Federal Courthouse.
As part of design guidance from the Whole Building Design Guide, this resource provides information on attributes of federal courthouses. In addition to the traditional life-safety and health concerns common to all buildings, federal courthouse facilities must adhere to guidelines for their aesthetics, security, adjacency and circulation, barrier-free access, mechanical/electrical systems, automation, acoustics, interior finishes, and signage.
Guidelines for New York State Court Facilities.
New York State Unified Court System.
The New York Unified Court system provides this resource of rules for the Chief Judge which outlines the basic guidelines for New York State court facilities.
National Institute of Building Sciences.
NIBS hosts the Whole Building Design Guide (WBDG) and provides an authoritative source of advice for both the private and public sector about the use of building science and technology. The WBDG serves as a gateway for building professionals to information on integrated, “whole building” design techniques and technologies. It is especially useful for information pertaining to federal courts.
Utah Judicial System Master Plan for Capital Facilities.
Salt Lake City: Utah Judicial Council.
The Utah Judicial Council has developed design guidelines and space standards to be used as a blueprint in the development of new court facilities and the renovation of existing ones. This online resource contains operational and facility planning guidelines, judicial design guidelines, and space standards.
Rogers, Donna.
"Getting the Courthouse You Need: The Power of Project Definition."
Courts Today (October 2007).
Those who decide to have a courthouse built are “owners” of the project. Good owners educate themselves and help define to the architect or builder what they want. This resource provides suggestions on some of the things that owners should be aware of when planning and participating in a courthouse project. “In the end, the most successful projects are not accomplished by hiring an architect and hoping for the best. They are achieved by actively working together.” (NA4471 .A15 C68 2007)
Kentucky Court Facilities Criteria.
Frankfort: Kentucky Administrative Office of the Courts (May 2007).
The Kentucky Administrative Office of the Courts sets the criteria for court facilities eligible for AOC funding. This resource outlines the uniform space (facility) allowances for those court facilities eligible for financial support.
Kentucky Court Facilities Design Guide.
Frankfort: Kentucky Administrative Office of the Courts (May 2007).
"This resource sets forth design guidance (requirements) to be used in the development of a design for Court Facilities, Court Support Facilities and Administrative Facilities within the Commonwealth of Kentucky, which are supportable, totally or in part, with Commonwealth of Kentucky Administrative Office of the Courts funds. It is applicable to all construction projects, including additions, alterations, adaptations, rehabilitations, and conversions."--Web site.
Pamphlet: IT Considerations for Courthouse Design.
Supreme Court of Ohio. Technology Services Section (April 2007).
When building or renovating a courthouse, it is important to consider the implications of all today’s technology. Things such as networking wiring, telephone wiring, special facilities for the computers, and space for the IT Personnel are all important considerations. This pamphlet provides a brief overview of such issues.
U.S. Courts Design Guide.
Washington, D.C.: Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Committee on Security and Facilities and the Subcommittee on Space Standards (2007).
This guide serves as a planning tool for federal judges and key judicial personnel who are directly involved in the design of a federal court facility. Second, it provides relevant information for the General Services Administration (GSA) and an architecture/engineering (A/E) team to plan, program, and design a functional, aesthetically appropriate, and cost-effective court facility. Last, it provides policy guidance for the overall planning, programming, and design of federal court facilities throughout the United States and its territories.
Report on Oregon Court Facilities.
Court Facilities Task Force (December 2006).
The Task Force on Oregon Court Facilities identified three issues, which it addressed through research and this resulting report: defining guidelines for adequate court facilities, exploring different options for ownership of court facilities (state versus local), and exploring options for financing the replacement, renovation, and repair of facilities as appropriate.
California Trial Court Facilities Standards.
San Francisco: Judicial Council of California (2006).
The California Administrative Office of the Courts has the responsibility for design, construction, and management of court facilities, and they have determined that it is prudent to develop standards reflecting the best practices and successful solutions for basic components of the trial court building. The standards listed in this resource will apply to the design and construction of court facilities.
Flanders, Steven.
Celebrating the Courthouse: A Guide for Architects, their Clients, and the Public.
New York: W.W. Norton (2006).
"Thirteen American architects, judges, administrators, and attorneys contribute 10 chapters examining the issues involved in designing an effective and satisfying courthouse building. The text is intended for those who are new to courthouse projects, including government agency personnel responsible for funding decisions, citizens' groups and bar associations, and architects. Coverage includes an historic overview of the courthouse as a building type and its image within the community; solving the distinctive problems of a courthouse project; the courthouse, its publics and its users; and the future of the courthouse." (NA4471 .C45 2006)
Phillips, Todd S., and Michael A. Griebel.
Building Type Basics for Justice Facilities.
New York: John Wiley and Sons (2003).
"This text discusses issues essential to the design of six building types: law enforcement, adult detention, courts, corrections, juvenile and family justice facilities, and multi-occupancy facilities. It also explores trends that influence the planning and design of current and future justice facilities, including flexibility, information technology, and accessibility."
(HV8827 .P55 2003)
Appellate Court Facilities Guidelines.
San Francisco: Judicial Council of California, Administrative Office of the Courts, Task Force on Court Facilities (2001).
This 69-page study includes information on "General Facilities Design Guidelines," "The Courtroom," "Judicial Offices and Support Space," "Court Administration," "Court and Building Support," "Court Security," and "Design Guidelines."
Wong, F. Michael, ed.
Judicial Administration and Space Management: A Guide for Architects, Court Administrators, and Planners.
Gainesville: University Press of Florida (2001).
"The main purpose of this book is to integrate the components of judicial administration with space management concepts, approaches, and principles and to evaluate the impact of changes in judicial administration on the planning, design, and utilization of space and facilties in judicial buildings."--Preface (NA4471 .J83)
Hardenbergh, Don, and Todd S. Phillips, eds.
Retrospective of Courthouse Design, 1991-2001.
Williamsburg, Va.: National Center for State Courts (2001).
This publication features courthouses of many different styles that were built between 1991 and 2001. Included in the retrospective are U.S. courthouses, state appellate courts, general-jurisdiction trial courts, municipal and limited-jurisdiction courts, family and juvenile courts, and a section on renovations and additions. 
Hardenbergh, Don.
Virginia Courthouse Facility Guidelines.
(2001).
The Judicial Council of Virginia adopted these guidelines to initiate improvements in their court facilities. These guidelines will significantly enhance the ability of courts to discharge their responsibilities in a safe, efficient, and convenient environment.
The Michigan Courthouse: A Planning and Design Guide for Trial Court Facilities.
Lansing: Michigan Court Facilities Standards Project Advisory Committee (December 2000).
"The resource suggests guidelines for the design of Michigan court facilities by using examples of court components from Michigan courthouses and others throughout the United States. It is intended to highlight those components of a courthouse that require special consideration in designing a new facility or expanding an existing courthouse."--Intro.
Phillips, Todd S.
"Courthouses: Designing Justice for All."
Architectural Record (March 1999).
The author says that the traditional lexicon of courthouse design has always included "solemnity," "dignity," "integrity," "orderliness," and "civic presence," and courthouses were designed with these words in mind. This article discusses how computer technology, security, and accessibility have become part of the new lexicon and are now the driving factors in the design of new courthouses. (NA4471 .A15 C68 2007)
Nebraska Courts Facility Planning: Guidelines and Standards.
Supreme Court of Nebraska (1999).
The Supreme Court of Nebraska has provided these guidelines to assist local and county officials identify and solve their facility problems in such a way to meet current and future needs. The standards for courtrooms and court offices are suggested for all renovations and new construction.
Boxwell, Charles E. et al.
"Technologies and Courthouse Design: Challenges for Today and Tomorrow."
Court Manager 12, No. 3, pp. 7-10 (Summer 1997).
As technology improves so can the productiveness of court employees. To that end, judicial leaders will need to take into account how technology can impact workflow, court employees, and the public. Courthouses need to be designed to properly accommodate new and emerging technologies. The authors suggest that increased collaboration between the justice-system and design professionals is necessary to properly integrate technology into court facility design. (NA4471 .A15 C68 2007)
Courthouse Construction: Better Courtroom Use Data Could Enhance Facility Planning and Decisionmaking.
Washington, D.C.: United States General Accounting Office (May 1997).
This report outlines a study of selected judicial districts and courthouses to determine how often and for what purposes courtrooms have been used by U.S. District Court judges. It also examines what steps the judiciary is taking to access-space and courtroom-usage issues.
Standard Level Features and Finishes for U.S. Courts Facilities.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Services Administration, Public Buildings Service (1996).
This is a complementary document to the "U.S. Courts Design Guide." It establishes the baseline, standard-level features and finishes for U.S. courts facilities that are funded by the General Service Administration. It is intended to create a level of quality to determine costs.
Hardenbergh, Don, ed.
Retrospective of Courthouse Design 1980-1991.
Williamsburg, Va.: National Center for State Courts (1992).
This publication features courthouses of many different styles that were built between 1980 and 1991. Included in the retrospective are federal courts, appellate courts, general jurisdiction courts, limited-jurisdiction courts, and juvenile and family courts.
Greenberg, Allan.
Courthouse Design: A Handbook for Judges and Court Administrators.
Chicago: American Bar Association, Commission on Standards of Judicial Administration (1975).
This resource explores the process of creating a new courthouse. It begins by discussing the client and architect; continues with design and construction, budgeting, site selection, interior space considerations; and finally ends by discussing courthouse security concerns. (NA4471 .G73)
Alfini, James J., and Glenn R. Winters, eds.
Courthouses and Courtrooms: Selected Readings.
Chicago: American Judicature Society (1972).
Although this collection is dated, its articles discuss relevant issues in courthouse design. The first section discusses some of the history of courthouse design, the second section discusses specific courthouse construction and remodeling projects, while the last section discusses juror accomodations and facilities for the media. (NA4471 .A73)
Top
Eaton, Seth and William D. Locher.
"Give PPPs a Chance: Public-Private Partnerships May Be a Solution to California`s Infrastructure Funding Crisis."
Los Angeles Lawyer (January 2009).
This article illustrates California's renewed interest in public-private partnerships (PPPs). In many cases PPPs have been considered for transportation projects; however, "the California Legislature is now exploring ways to tap the resources of the private sector and develop innovative means to finance and deliver a variety of infrastructure improvements."
Court Facility Bonds: How Can the State Best Address Its Court Facility Deficiencies?.
Sacramento: California Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2006).
This resource illustrates the efforts and concerns of using bonds to finance needed renovations in court facilities. This background paper by the Assembly Judiciary Committee outlines several legislative proposals for using bonds and illustrates some of the difficulties faced when considering new and exisiting courthouse construction and financing.
Tobin, Robert W.
A Court Manager`s Guide to Court Facility Financing.
Williamsburg, Va.: National Center for State Courts (October 1995).
This resource "is intended primarily for judges and court managers who are faced with the necessity of gathering resources to build or renovate court facilities."--Goals. Illustrated within this resource are financing options and guidance on carrying out the responsibilities associated with court facility financing.
Top
Justice for All: Designing Accessible Courthouses.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Access Board (November 2006).
This resource contains a set of recommendations from the Courthouse Access Advisory Committee. This group is composed of 35 members, including designers and architects, disability groups, attorneys, members of the judiciary, court adminstrators, and others who developed design solutions and recommendations for accessible courthouses.
Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities; State and Local Government; Final Rule. .
Federal Register, Part II, 36 CFR Part 1191 (January 1998).
"The guidelines ensure that newly constructed and altered State and local government facilities are readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities in terms of architecture, design, and communication".
ADAAG Manual: A Guide to the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (1998).
"The Access Board of the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board has issued this guide to assist in the use of its Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) for buildings and facilities. It explains some of the basic considerations for accessible design and clarifies specific ADAAG provisions"--Abstract.
Bleyer, Kristi et al.
Into the Jury Box: A Disability Accommodation Guide for State Courts.
American Bar Association (1994).
This resource continues "Opening the Courthouse Door: An ADA Access Guide for State Courts" by focusing on each step of jury service and offering suggestions on how to modify current practices to improve accessibility. Among the issues discussed are jury summons, orientation and voir dire, courtroom accommodations, and jury deliberations. (KF8972 .B58)
Dooley, Jeanne et al.
Opening the Courthouse Door: An ADA Access Guide for State Courts.
Washington D.C.: American Bar Association (1992).
"Courts must provide access in a way that integrates individuals with disabilities as much as possible into the mainstream of court activities"--Intro. This resource discusses the types of disabilities, how to assist people though court processes, how to make the facility accessible, jury service, community resources, and funding options. (KF8732.5 .D66 1992)
Court-Related Needs of the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities: A Blueprint for the Future.
Washington, D.C.: American Bar Association (1991).
Recommendations of the February 1991 conference. (KF480 .C891 1991)
Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards.
Federal Register (FR 31528) (August 1984).
This document presents uniform standards for the design, construction, and alteration of buildings so that physically handicapped persons will have access to them in accordance with the Architectural Barriers Act.
Top
Groen, Peter J.
``Green`` Information Technology (IT) Strategies & Practices.
The author, a faculty member at Shepherd University, provides an overview of "green" technology with suggestions and examples of promoting energy efficiency and sustainability. The author believes that these suggestions will reduce energy consumption, enhance energy independence, reduce electronic waste, and generate positive public relations.
10 Ways to Go Green at Work.
Sierra Club.
The Sierra Club has provided a list of 10 tips for going "green" at your office or courthouse. Many of these same suggestions are included in Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) standards.
16 Ways to Green Your Home.
U.S. Green Building Council.
This publication from the Green Building Council illustrates ways in which you can save resources and go "green" at home. Many of these same tips can be used in your courthouse workplace.
Ada County Courthouse and Administration Building.
Ada County Operations Department.
The Ada County Courthouse and Administration Building (Idaho) is an example of a facility that has achived a LEED-EB Silver Certification in May 2005. This brochure outlines some of the features of this project for existing building (EB) certification.
An Overview of LEED for Existing Buildings.
U.S. Green Building Council.
This guide provide a short overview of LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) and discusses the advantages of "going green." It provides an explanation of the rating system and certification strategy.
Townsend, Amy K.
Green at Work Guide: Making Your Workplace Activities More Environmentally Friendly.
Sustainable Development International.
This guide, created for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, was written to help make greening office operations easy for all Commonwealth agencies by offering standardized information and references. In it, you will find ways to green your office or courthouse by making simple changes to the way that you approach your facilities, office supplies, recycling, equipment use, meetings, and other day-to-day workplace activities.
Green Guidelines.
Massachusetts Bar Association.
The Massachusetts Bar Association has created Green Guidelines to assist its members assess current environmental practices and commit to adopting more environmentally sustainable actions. A recent publication is on Landscape Management and contains valuable suggestions for sustainable practices in maintaining your yard or the area around a court facility.
Green Office Guide.
Sustainable Industries.
The full title of this resource is "Green Office Guide: How to Create a More Efficient Workplace, Buy Better Office Products and Measure Your Success" and it encourages businesses to take a “systems” approach to improving office operations. The first focus is on opportunities businesses have to reduce the impact of their office through smarter commuting, paper use, business travel, and simple steps toward energy and water-efficiency. Then, users can find "green" purchasing recommendations for materials needed by their office.
Green Office Guide: A Guide to Greening Your Bottom Line Through a Resource-Efficient Office Environment .
City of Portland: Office of Sustainable Development.
Simply stated, energy-efficiency, waste reduction, water conservation, and other resource-efficient practices are better for the environment and your bottom line. Considerable cost savings can be achieved by using resource-efficient products and practices. To that end, the City of Portland Oregon has created this guide which is both comprehensive and easy to use. Chapter 1 provides an overview of resource use in offices. Resource-saving options are spelled out in the seven sections of Chapter 2. These sections cover areas of a typical office operation: Lighting, Office Equipment, Paper Products, Heating and Cooling, Water, Cars and Parking, and Other, a final catch-all section.
Sustainable Design Program.
General Services Administration.
The General Services Administration (GSA) is committed to incorporating principles of sustainable design and energy efficiency into all of its building projects. The result is an optimal balance of cost, environmental, societal and human benefits while meeting the mission and function of the intended facility. It is GSA's intent that sustainable design will be integrated as seamlessly as possible into the existing design and construction process. As a means of evaluating and measuring green building achievements, all GSA new construction projects and substantial renovations must be certified through the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED®) Green Building Rating System of the U.S. Green Building Council. Examples of GSA LEED certified projects (which include federal courthouses) can be found here.
The ABA-EPA Law Office Climate Challenge.
American Bar Association. Section of Environment, Energy and Resources.
The ABA Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources (SEER) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have designed a program to encourage law offices to take simple, practical steps to become better environmental and energy stewards. Your law office (including law firms, government offices, citizens groups, courts, law schools and other law-related entities) can participate by implementing best practices for office paper management or by joining at least one of three EPA partnership (that is, voluntary) programs that encourage better office paper management, the use of renewable energy, and better energy management. This web site describes the program and provides valuable information on energy savings.
Chicago Bar Association Task Force on Green Courts Initiative for the Circuit Court of Cook County: Final Report and Recommendations.
Chicago Bar Association (December 2008).
This report details the Task Force's examination on how the Cook County courts could go "green" through green initiatives and a "paperless" court system. Recommendations encourage the expansion of e-filing and other electronic services in the Cook County courts and various sustainable office measures being undertaken in law offices and legal related public offices in Cook County.
Green Justice: An Environmental Action Plan for the New York State Court System.
New York State Unified Court System (November 2008).
The title of this report Green Justice might suggest doing justice for the environment, and indeed this is an important goal. But for the New York State Judiciary, whose very purpose is to do justice, Green Justice also means doing justice in millions of cases annually in a more sustainable and environmentally sensitive way. The goal of this report is to do what no justice system in the United States has yet done: to begin implementing a comprehensive environmental action plan covering the breadth of court operations and the Judiciary’s regulatory functions.
Loper, Rachel and Robert Loper.
How Green is My Law Firm?.
(November 2008).
Law firms have often embraced a commitment to pro bono work as a social responsibility. Now, many law firms are extending their social responsibility to creating a "greener" or more sustainable way of operation. In this material, there are many suggestions on how your law firm or court can adopt a "greener" way of conducting business and sample implementation and procurement policies.
Gale, Sarah Fister.
Top 8 Ways to Go Green on the Cheap.
Greenbiz.com (November 2008).
There are many things your court or organization can do to go "green." However, starting such an initiative can often be difficult. The author discusses this issue and provide 8 tips to jump start your court's or business "green" efforts.
Naditz, Alan.
Green IT 101: Technology Helps Businesses and Colleges Become Enviro-Friendly.
Sustainability 1, No. 3 (October 2008).
Being "tech savvy" now can also mean saving money and the environment. As you plan to outfit your courthouse or use your existing court technology, this article provides suggestions on the efficient purchase, use, and disposal of your electronic equipment.
Morissette, Mary.
GSA Building Modernization: Design Excellence and LEED Gold Certification.
AAJ Journal (Fall 2008).
The General Services Administration (GSA) has been working towards sustainable design for all new federal construction. As part of the process, this article explains the efforts towards achieving a LEED-EB Gold certification for the Byron G. Rogers U.S. Courthouse in Denver, Colorado.
Melaver, Martin.
Sorting Through Green Building Myths and Facts.
Sustainable Land Development Today Online (October 2008).
The author explains that "going green" can be not only cost effective in energy savings but also in construction and renovation. He mentions two studies that show that green certified buildings outperform peers in occupany rates, sale price, and rental rates. The construction of energy efficient and healthy places to work benefits both employees and the environment.
LEED for Existing Buildings: Operations and Maintenance.
U.S. Green Building Council (September 2008).
The LEED for Exisiting Buildings: Operations and Maintenance (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) is a set of voluntary performance standards for the sustainable operation of buildings not undergoing major renovations. It provides sustainability guidelines for building operations, periodic upgrades of building systems, minor space-use changes and building processes. It also addresses maintenance programs, optimized use of energy and water, the purchase of environmentally perferred products and food, waste stream management and indoor environmental quality. Upon meeting all the prerquisites and earning a set minimum number of points, your court facility can achieve LEED certification. A project checklist can be found here.
Rogers, Donna.
Trends in Green Courthouse Design.
Courts Today 6, no. 1 (February 2008).
Some judicial and law enforcement facilities are now being designed with sustainability concepts, such as LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) standards, in mind. This article illustrates such of the concept of LEED certification and discusses some of the newest courthouse construction using sustainability standards. Among the courthouses discussed are Klamath County Courts in Klamath Falls Oregon, the Calgary Courts Centre in Calgary, Alberta and the Routt County Courthouse in Steamboat Springs, Colorado (NA4471 .A15 C68 2007).
Dibble, Tim, and Fiona Cousins.
"Modern Courthouses and the New Green."
Court Manager 22, No. 4 (Winter 2008).
The authors stress two major trends in courthouse architecture in the last 15 years: a renewed focus on courthouse design led by the federal government and the General Services Administration’s design excellence program, and increased emphasis on “green” design and architecture. Environmental sustainability and its impact on courthouses are discussed, along with several recently constructed courthouses that abide by the national LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) program. (NA4471 .A15 C68 2007)
McMillan, James E.
Green Computing - Green Courthouses.
(2008).
This presentation from E-Courts 2008 provides suggestions on saving energy through the use of energy efficient electronics and smarter courthouse design and construction.
"How Green Is My Courthouse?."
The Third Branch 39, No. 9 (September 2007).
"What makes a courthouse green? Is it the bike rack out front or the building occupant's recycling program inside?" This article examines the General Services Administration (GSA) requirement that all new construction projects (including courthouses) be certified as "green" through the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) green-building rating system. Several recently constructed or renovated federal courthouses are illustrated.
Integrating Electronics Stewardship Into Your EMS.
Federal Electronics Challenge (August 2007).
The Federal Electronics Challenge (FEC) is a partnership program that encourages federal facilities and agencies to: purchase greener electronic products, reduce impacts of electronic products during use, and manage obsolete electronics in an environmentally safe way. As part of "green" courts, the selection and use of your computer equipment and courthouse technology can impact your environment. This guide provides highlights on how good selection, use, and disposal of courthouse electronic equipment should be a part of your Environmental Management System (EMS).
LEED for New Construction and Major Renovations.
U.S. Green Building Council (October 2005).
Buildings fundamentally impact people’s lives and the health of the planet. In the United States, buildings use one-third of our total energy, two-thirds of our electricity, one-eighth of our water, and transform land that provides valuable ecological resources. Since the LEED Green Building Rating System for New Construction (LEED-NC version 2.0) was first published in 1999, it has been helping professionals across the country to improve the quality of our buildings and their impact on the environment. Green design not only makes a positive impact on public health and the environment, it also reduces operating costs, enhances building and organizational marketability, potentially increases occupant productivity, and helps create a sustainable community. LEED fits into this market by providing rating systems that are voluntary, consensus-based, market-driven, based on accepted energy and environmental principles, and they strike a balance between established practices and emerging concepts. The LEED rating systems are developed by USGBC committees, in adherence with USGBC policies and procedures guiding the development and maintenance of rating systems. This latest version, LEED-NC version 2.2, provides guidelines for new construction and major renovation. A project checklist can be found here.
Green Courthouse Design Concepts.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Services Administration, Public Buildings Service (1997).
This site summarizes courthouse-building features and project-delivery concepts advocated by a panel of architecture experts. The report addresses a range of environmental issues impacting the workplace, building construction, the community, and the larger ecosystem.
Sustainable Building Technical Manual.
Public Technology Inc (1996).
Planning a new courthouse? If so, you may want to consult the Sustainable Building Technical Manual: Green Building Design, Construction, and Operations. It is one of the most comprehensive publications now available to help architects, developers, building owners, government officials, and others implement sustainable development practices. It contains more than 300 pages of practical, step-by-step advice on sustainable buildings written by some of the foremost experts in the field. Among the issues the book addresses are the economics of green building; pre-design strategies; passive solar design; heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems; electricity; plumbing; indoor air quality; acoustics; selection of building and landscaping materials; and housekeeping.
Top
Child Care Centers Overview.
United States General Services Administration.
This website provides details on GSA sponsored child care programs (state-by-state list of federal agencies, including federal courthouses, that provide child-care centers for employees).
Colorado House Bill 02-1101.
The Family-Friendly Courts Act specifies that the state court administrator, in determining which judicial districts may receive grant monies for the provision of family-friendly court services, shall consider the extent to which a judicial district is responsible for specified aspects of providing child care and other family services for persons attending court proceedings.
Pennsylvania Statute: Child Care Facilities.
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, Judicial and Judiciary Procedure (Title 42), Chapter 37, Section 3721.
This statute provides that a county judicial center or courthouse may provide a child care facility for use by children whose parents or guardians are present at the county judicial center or courthouse for a court appearance or other matter related to any civil or criminal action where the person's presence has been requested or is necessary.
Ngwa-Suh, Manka.
Facility Facelifts: How Courthouses are Accommodating Children and Youth.
Children Voice 15, no. 1 (January 2006).
This article describes waiting rooms and various other measures to better accommodate the children and youth who pass through the court system each year, whether they are testifying, having decisions made about their futures in foster care, or waiting for adults who are conducting their own court business.
Model, Morgan.
Improving Quality of Life in 1801 Vine Street Family Court Dependency Waiting Room.
(May 2005).
This is a project from the author, an MPH candidate, regarding the services of the Philadelphia Family Court. Families who come to court for delinquency or dependency cases (child abuse or child neglect) generally find the court waiting room to be uncomfortable and dehumanizing. There is a lack of environmental and social resources available to these individuals while they are in the waiting room. In addition, clients are generally uninformed about the court process, their client rights, and services available to them outside the courtroom. The goal of this project is to improve the quality of life in the waiting room through dissemination of information and structural improvements to the environment. These improvements hold the potential to better serve an ethnically diverse, low income population and improve the court process.
Waiting Room for Children.
Great Falls, Montana: Yellowstone County New Laywers Association (October 2000).
The Waiting Room For Children Project evolved several years ago in Billings, Montana where the local Yellowstone County New Lawyers Association ("YCNLA") wanted to participate in a community project that would benefit children who were victims of crimes and had no choice but to participate in the legal process. At the time, children who were scheduled to testify in open court met with the County Attorneys in their individual offices, often surrounded by intimidating adults and a sterile office environment. YCNLA wanted to change that system and provide a comfortable, kid-friendly environment for children where they could meet with the attorneys and victim/witness coordinators and wait in a stress-free room until they were scheduled to testify. Victim/witness advocates for our local county emphasized the importance of providing a warm and comfortable environment for children to discuss issues related to child abuse and felt that a room dedicated for this purpose would enhance the court process for children, not only in their willingness to participate but also in the quality of their testimony.
Silka, Linda.
"Court-based Child Care: Results from the Field."
Lowell: Center for Family, Work, and Community, University of Massachusetts (1998).
This draft article focuses on how these programs actually operate and what lessons can be learned from the collaboration. (KF8732 .S57 1998)
Children in the Halls of Justice: A Report on Child Care in the Courts.
Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Social Policy (June 1995).
This report documents the problems caused by the presence of children in courthouses, both for the court and for the children. The report also identifies and describes the range of court-based child-care programs that are currently operating across the country. (KF8732 .C54)
Court Care: Planning Child Care for the Courts.
Massachusetts Trial Court Child Care Project (1995).
This manual provides guidance on developing a child care program in the courthouse based on the experiences of the Roxbury District Court Child Care Center. Topics covered include selecting a team, determining child care needs, setting up a program, and providing financing. (HV854 .C68 1995)
Hudson, Lucy.
Granting Children a Court Recess: A Program Operations Manual for Child Care in the Courts.
Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Social Policy (1995).
This manual provides resource materials for judges, court personnel, and other parties developing court-based child-care centers. It draws heavily on the work in court-based child-care programs in several states, including California, Illinois, Massachusetts, and New York. (KF8732 .H83)
Hurst, H., and Adamcik, L. P.
Shaping a New Order in the Court: A Sourcebook for Juvenile and Family Court Design.
Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice (1992).
This is a series of recommendations (for example, providing child-care areas in juvenile and family courts). (NA4471 H87)
|
