Race and Ethnic Fairness

 

State: Ohio            Report 1

 

Committee/Report Name:  The Racial Fairness Implementation Task Force was created to develop an action plan to implement the recommendations of the 1999 Ohio Commission on Racial Fairness report. The implementation report titled “The Racial Implementation Task Force Action Plan was published in 2002.

 

Number of Committee Members: There were 15 members on the Racial Fairness Implementation Task Force and 33 members on the Ohio Commission on Racial Fairness task force.

 

Number of Subcommittees: The task force created six subcommittees: Judge’s and attorney’s perceptions; Employment and appointment practices in the courts; Jury issues; Criminal justice and sentencing; Law schools; and Interpreter services.

 

Chair/Co-Chairs: There was one chair for the Racial Fairness Implementation Task Force

 

Methods Used: Public hearings, surveys, and comprehensive research.

 

 

Topics and Recommendations

 

Perception

 

Attorneys, Judges, and Court Staff

 

      Recommendation

 

1.       The Supreme Court of Ohio should establish an implementation task force on racial bias in the legal profession to consider and implement recommendations suggested in this report, as well as other methods to eradicate racial bias problems in the legal profession and courts.

Action

Chief Justice Thomas Moyer appointment of the Racial Fairness Implementation Task Force in July 2000.

2.   The Supreme Court should revise the Code of Professional Responsibility similarly to the Code of Judicial conduct, specifically Canon 3(B) (5) and (6).

            Action

The Task Force believes that existing Disciplinary Rule 1-102 (B0 is sufficient to accomplish the purpose.

3.   Bar associations and the Court should develop more effective working relationships with minority attorneys. Various bar associations, local and state clerkship and mentoring programs should continue.

Action

The numerous efforts of bar associations and private organizations in metropolitan areas should continue. The state bar association should continue its leadership role in this area. The Task Force believes this could be expanded so that each bar district could have its own programs on diversity.

4.   The Supreme Court of Ohio should include in the attorney registration materials questions soliciting information on ethnic status.

Action

The Task Force commends the Supreme Court of Ohio for placing on the attorney registration form categories similar to the U.S. Census categories.

5.   The Implementation Task Force should develop an anti-racism workshop curriculum that would be implemented by the Ohio Judicial College, OSBA and the Ohio Continuing Legal Education Institute as an annual workshop offered to judges, attorneys and courthouse personnel.

Action

The Task Force recommends that two hours of anti-racism/diversity training be added to the continuing legal education requirement for judges and attorneys for each biennial reporting cycle. The total number of hours would not be increased.

6.   The Supreme Court should conduct a survey of county and appellate court administrators throughout the state to determine the language needs of non-English speaking court participants.

Action

This recommendation is addressed under the Interpreter Services section.

 

Access

 

Language

 

1.   The Supreme Court of Ohio should immediately develop, and require the implementation of, concrete guidelines for the certification and qualification of individuals and programs that provide language interpreter services in the courts of Ohio.

Action

The Task Force recommends the Supreme Court of Ohio pursue establishing statewide interpretation standards for professionals providing such services in a legal setting. The Task Force further recommends the Supreme Court of Ohio become a member of the State Courts Interpreter Certification Consortium of the National Center for State Courts.

2.   The Supreme Court of Ohio should develop, and require adherence to, a code of conduct for all individuals who are certified to provide interpreter services in the court of Ohio.

Action

The Task Force recommends the Supreme Court of Ohio develop, and require adherence to, a code of conduct for all individuals who are certified to provide interpreter services in the court of Ohio.

3.   The Supreme Court of Ohio should require education for judges, referees and court administrators on the importance, availability and proper use of language interpreter services in the courts.

Action

The Task Force recommends the Supreme Court of Ohio adopt Rules of Superintendence to judges in the appropriate use of credentialed interpreters. The Task Force recommends the Court publish and distribute a guidebook for judges about when and how to use interpreters.

4.   The Supreme Court should conduct a survey of county and appellate court administrators throughout the state to determine the language needs of non-English speaking court participants.

Action

The Task Force recommends the Supreme Court of Ohio conduct a survey of trial court administrators throughout the state to determine the language needs of non-English speaking court participants.

 

Juries

 

Recommendations

 

1.   The sources for jury selection should be further expanded.

            Action

The Task Force recommends including driver’s license records as sources for voter registration lists, and excluding state identification records.

2.   The state law restriction of $40 maximum compensation a day should be periodically reviewed for fairness and the amount increased where appropriate to meet juror’s economic needs/

Action

The Task Force recommends the Supreme Court review juror compensation periodically.

3.   Research should be conducted to determine accurately the pattern of minority under representation in juries in Ohio state courts.

Action

The Task Force recommends the Supreme Court facilitate research to determine whether and to what extent there is minority under representation in Ohio state courts.

  1. Research should be conducted concerning the ways in which minority jurors are treated and their racial perceptions during court proceedings and while deliberating with their peers during a trial
  2. The Supreme Court of Ohio should require racial diversity education for jurors as part of their orientation, and for lawyers as a part of continuing legal education
  3. The Supreme Court of Ohio and the Ohio State Bar Association should institute a comprehensive, statewide community education program on jury duty.

Action for 4-6

The Task Force recommends the Supreme Court facilitate the production of a video for statewide use designed to address both general jury duty orientation and racial diversity education for jurors. The production will include scenarios featuring people of different races performing and holding various positions in the justice system.

 

Legal Profession

 

Recruitment/Acceptance to Law School

 

1.   Law schools should give priority to efforts to recruit and retain minority student. The Commission strongly supports and encourages affirmative action and diversity programs that attract and retain minority students and staff.

Action

The Task Force endorses the Commission’s recommendation and recommends the implementation in Ohio of a program similar to the Indiana Supreme Court’s Conference for Legal Education Opportunity.

2.   The Admissions Committee should include minority student representation.

Action

The Task Force endorses the Commission’s recommendation and urges all law schools to comply.

3.   Law schools should recruit and maintain minorities to serve as law school faculty and staff and adopt policies aimed at advancement toward tenure and retention of minority faculty members.

Action

The Task Force endorses the Commission’s recommendation and urges all law schools to comply.

4.   Law schools should evaluate the graduation rates among students of color and include an objective evaluation of the scope and effectiveness of each school’s academic support programs.

Action

The Task Force endorses the Commission’s recommendation.

5.   Law schools should review their academic program to assess ways in which diversity values are manifest throughout the institution.

Action

The Task Force endorses the Commission’s recommendation.

6.   Law schools should continue to review their courses, extracurricular programming, introduction to law programs, student orientation and student life to consider the extent to which diversity values are embedded in their academic and nonacademic programming.

7.   Law schools should continue to review co-curricular programs to ensure minority students are actively sought out for inclusion. Faculty and law review members should make certain the writing competitions and application processes are fair and equal to all students.

Action for 6 and 7

The Task Force endorses both of these recommendations and urges all law schools to continue to do this on an annual basis, with special attention to the importance of law review status.

8.   Placement directors should be encouraged to work with professional associations, bar organizations, minority alumni and the courts to facilitate the entry of minority students into summer clerkships and other opportunities which lead to professional development.

Action

The Task Force endorses the Commission’s recommendation.

9.   The Commission recommends all ohio law schools should continue to annually review their policies and internal procedures for addressing violations of human rights for discrimination and make modification as necessary to foster confidence and a commitment to racial fairness among faculty, staff and students. If such a policy and procedure does not exist, one should be adopted within one year and reviewed annually.

Action

The Task Force endorses the Commission’s recommendation.

10.  The Commission recommends the Supreme Court collect racial and ethnic information on bar examination candidates and monitor the results for race-based discrepancies.

Action

The Task Force endorses the Commission’s recommendation.

11.  The Commission recommends that each law school should continue to monitor and evaluate student and faculty recruitment and retention. Law schools should report relevant data as may be prescribed by the Supreme Court of Ohio.

Action

The Task Force endorses the first portion of this recommendation and finds that the reporting portion is unnecessary because the relevant data is already publicly available. The Task Force recommends that progress on fulfilling the recommendation of the Racial Fairness Commission and the Racial Fairness Implementation task Force be added as a standing agenda item for the bench/bar/deans conference.

 

Criminal Justice

 

            Recommendations

 

1.   All groups and organizations involved in the criminal justice system engage in a continuing process of study and discussion with the objective of identifying and eradicating race-based attitudes and practices.

Action

The Task Force recommends that the Supreme Court of Ohio offer continuing legal education courses for lawyers and judges with the aim of eradicating race-based attitudes and practices throughout the system.

2.   Statistical data as to race should be collected as to pre-trial bond decisions.

Action

The Task Force recommends the Supreme Court of Ohio require the collection of racial data on pre-trial bond decisions.

3.   Statistical data as to race should be maintained in connection with sentences, including community-based sentences, in all criminal cases, including misdemeanor , juvenile and traffic cases.

Action

The Task Force recommends the Supreme Court of Ohio require compliance with all reporting requirements of Senate Bill 2 to ensure that statistical data regarding race is maintained in connection with sentences, including community-based sentences, in all criminal cases.

4.   Law enforcement agencies maintain statistical data as to race in connection will all arrests.

5.   Implementation of the recommendations of the Ohio Commission on African-American males.

Action for 4 and 5

The Task Force recommends that law enforcement agencies be encouraged to continue or implement the collection of statistical data about race in connection with all arrests and stops.

6.   All attorneys who wish to do criminal defense work should receive formal training in the basics of criminal defense, and only be permitted to do so upon obtaining certification as to proficiency.

Action

The Task Force recommends that all attorneys wanting to perform criminal defense work receive formal training in the basics of criminal defense.

7.   The Bowling Green State University study should be reviewed and its recommendations be implemented.

Action

The Task Force supports the recommendations of the 1993 Bowling Green State University study entitled “Race and Juvenile Justice in Ohio” and encourages adoption of its recommendations.

8.   The Supreme Court should require that Common Pleas Courts adopt a form for purposes of complying with the requirements of S.B. section 2953.21 (A)(5) of the Revised Code.

9.   The Supreme Court should enforce the mandate of S.B. that the Ohio Criminal Sentencing Commission monitor the effects of S.B. 2 with regard to R.C. 181.25, Sentencing Commission Duties as amended by S.B.2.

Action for 8 and 9

The Task Force supports the Commission’s recommendation.

10.  The Supreme Court should engage a person or entity with the necessary skill and experience to design meaningful methodologies for the collction and compilation of relevant data as to race at all relevant stages of the criminal justice system, and to monitor the collection and compilation of the data.

Action

The Task Force recommends the Supreme Court of Ohio engage a person/entity with the necessary skill and experience to design methodologies for collecting data on race at all relevant stages of the criminal justice system, and to monitor its compilation.

11.  The Supreme Court should establish the responsibility for implementing the recommendations contained in this section in the Office of the Court Administrator for the Supreme Court and require an annual report to the public and the progress obtained.

Action

The Task Force recommends the Supreme Court of Ohio establish responsibility for implementing the recommendations contained in this section with the Office of the Administrative Director for the Supreme Court of Ohio and require an annual progress report to the public.

 

Court as employer/appointer

 

Hiring/Promotion

 

Recommendations

 

1.   The court system should recruit, hire and retain increased numbers of minorities in all positions in the court system.

Action

The Supreme Court of Ohio should develop and issue an equal opportunity policy statement for disseminating, posting and utilization by all courts in the state.

2.   The diversity goal-setting plans of managers, and the extent to which their goals are met, should be strongly evaluated in their merit and promotion reviews.

Action

The Task Force recommends the immediate adoption of this recommendation. Funds should be budgeted for the retention of employment specialists to develop uniform evaluation criteria.

3.   The Supreme Court should require that each court within the state complete a written report each year, on a form prescribed by rule, listing statistics on the race and gender of all employees of the court system.

Action

The Task Force recommends the immediate adoption of this recommendation. A part of the responsibility of the employment specialists would be the development of the data reporting form and the format for the publication of the annual data.

4.   The Supreme Court of Ohio should require that all judges and lawyers use their best efforts to guarantee a bias-free workplace.

Action

The Task Force recommends the immediate adoption of this recommendation, i.e. the adoption of a rule requiring all judges and lawyers to use their best efforts to guarantee a bias-free workplace.

5.   The Supreme Court should instruct the Ohio Judicial College to develop an interactive diversity training class required for all court employees.

Action

The Supreme Court should immediately forward instructions to the Ohio Judicial College to develop an interactive diversity training class with the provision that all employees are required to participate during normal work hours.

6.   The Attorney General should create a position in the Attorney General’s office with legal authority and responsibility to bring lawsuits in the name of the state against individuals and state agencies, including law enforcement or court agencies, the engage in discrimination or harassment against minorities.

Action

The Task Force determined that the existing Civil Rights Division of the Attorney General’s Office has the power to reach the desired goal.

7.   The Supreme Court of Ohio and the OSBA should (1) increase the representation of minorities among appointees to court boards and commissions to improve the judiciary’s ability to relate effectively with culturally diverse groups, (2) assure adequate minority representation on judicial screening and nominating committees, (3) set standards in court appointments and court volunteer programs to more accurately reflect the population to be served, and (4) promote minority judges and lawyers into more responsible positions.

Action

These recommendations are all goals that are designed to assure adequate representation on boards, commissions, committees and other important areas within the legal system and should be implemented. This recommendation should be coordinated with the Recommendation 3 in this section.

8.   Each appellate court district should establish a task force on the eradication of racial bias in court employment composed of: judges, attorneys, court administrators and other citizens.

Action

This recommendation should be implemented within the next 12 months.

 

National Center for State Courts
300 Newport Avenue
Williamsburg, VA 23185
Phone (800)616-6109 Fax (757)564-2022
Questions or Comments - email research@ncsc.dni.us
Copyright © 2004 The National Center for State Courts. All Rights Reserved.