National Center for State Courts

 

Improving Justice through Leadership
and Service to the Courts

     

  

Public Trust and Confidence Forum 
Unequal Treatment in the Justice System

Topics:

Diversity in the Justice System

  • (AR)  The Arkansas Bar Association has established the Arkansas Bar Commission on Diversity.  The Commission is working with a variety of other organizations and groups in order to improve racial diversity and fairness within the legal profession.

  • (AZ)  The Arizona Supreme Court’s Commission on Minorities and the Arizona Minority Judges’ Caucus work to promote judicial opportunities for all interested lawyers.

  • (KY)  The Minority Affairs Office will develop minority and diversity training for judicial and nonjudicial court personnel. Local judges and court clerks will be encouraged to increase the professional opportunities made available to members of minority communities by improving notification of employment opportunities at the local level.

  • (WA)  The Standing Committee on Public Trust and Confidence ensures that the courts demographically reflect the communities they serve.

Back to top

Diversity in Legal Education
  • (IN)  Through the Indiana Supreme Court-sponsored Indiana Conference on Legal Education Opportunity (ICLEO), a more diverse legal profession is being created. Established in 1997 and patterned after the national CLEO program, ICLEO provides $5,000 annual stipends to Indiana law school students who are educationally disadvantaged, members of a minority or have low incomes. The program also sponsors a 6-week preparatory course during the summer before law school starts to introduce the students to the rigors of law school.  Career counseling, employment opportunities, and bar examination preparation are just a few of the services offered by ICLEO.  Three graduates were selected to speak at their school’s graduation ceremonies. In 2000, the first ICLEO graduates passed the Indiana Bar Examination.

  • (KY)  The Office of Minority Affairs will form strategic partnerships with state colleges and universities to aggressively recruit minorities to pursue legal careers in Kentucky.

  • (OH)  In response to a recommendation of the Racial Fairness Commission, the Ohio Supreme Court is establishing an Ohio Commission for Legal Education Opportunity (CLEO) for disadvantaged students entering law school.

Back to top

Jury Diversity

  • (MI)  The State Bar of Michigan’s Open Justice Commission's jury representation project recognizes the importance of and urges broad citizen participation in the legal system.

  • (NM)  Over the last several years, recommendations have been made to improve the jury system by the New Mexico Supreme Court Committee to Study Racial and Ethnic Fairness and Equality in the Courts.  The committees’ recommendations address various concerns: lack of jury “representativeness” in an increasingly diverse society; enforced juror passivity during trials; and unacceptably low levels of juror comprehension of the evidence and of the court’s instructions.  Recommendations on the whole call for a more democratic juror experience, and one that is more educational.  Judges and trial attorneys are asked to be open to doing old things in new ways.  The main thrust is to be more receptive to the juror’s needs to learn better and to actively participate to a greater degree in the fact-finding process.  The major recommendations include:

    • Providing guidelines for courts in the use of interpreters for non-English speaking jurors, including the amendment of the jury summons to advise potential jurors of the availability of interpreting assistance

    • Investigating the advisability of adding additional juror source lists to enhance the representativeness of jury panels

    • Better meeting the needs of jurors with hearing and other physical impairments.

  • (NY)  New York's 8th Judicial District (comprising Buffalo and surrounding counties in Western New York) Committee has developed a program to educate minority communities about the importance of jury service participation, with the goal to make the juries in that district more representative of the general population.

Back to top

Training for Racial, Gender, and Ethnic Issues

  • (AZ)  The many councils, commissions and subcommittees of the Judicial Branch have been enriched by the addition of public members--non-lawyers and non-judges--and by the commitment to ethnic, gender and geographic diversity on these bodies.

  • (OH)  In response to a recommendation of the Racial Fairness Commission, the Ohio Supreme Court is implementing a diversity-training curriculum by the Ohio Judicial College.  

  • (UT)  In Utah, system-wide diversity training is now provided to all judges and court staff.  

  • (MI)  The State Bar of Michigan’s Open Justice Commission is in the process of implementing educational programs related to cultural awareness, juvenile justice, and sexual orientation for judges and lawyers. To the extent that it succeeds, it will expand the knowledge and awareness of both lawyers and judges, encouraging an environment of inclusion and fairness.

Back to top

Equal Treatment of Court Participants

  • (DC) The Subcommittee on Improving the Treatment of Participants by Judicial Officers met with representatives from the Office of the Corporation Counsel and the Public Defender Service.  The goal of the forum was to gather input and develop a plan for improving treatment that would be responsive to the group’s concerns.  Information and concerns raised at the forum as well as any recommendations that might be an outgrowth of the forum are in the process of being compiled in a report.

  • (IN)  The Supreme Court is seeking to make sure that people, regardless of race or gender, feel that the justice system operates fairly.  In late 1999, the Supreme Court created by court rule, the Race and Gender Fairness Commission that includes judicial, business, and community leaders.  

  • (NM)  Through a grant from the State Justice Institute, the Administrative Office of the Courts has retained the services of an expert to advise the Supreme Court on methods the courts could use to gather information on the race and ethnicity of litigants in all cases.  The purpose of such data gathering would be to produce routine reports on the relationship between the outcomes of court cases and the race or ethnicity of the litigants to ensure that members of minority groups are not being treated differently from other litigants by court processes.  The Supreme Court has authorized an experiment with data gathering forms in the state’s two largest trial courts to determine the reaction of the bar, litigants and the public to such data gathering efforts.  

  • (MI)  The State Bar of Michigan’s Open Justice Commission is actively involved in 35 programs and projects related to the elimination of bias and discrimination based on gender, race, ethnic origin, religion, sexual orientation, and disability within the judicial system and the legal profession. In its mission statement, the Commission is specifically charged with responsibility to “increase public confidence in the fairness of the legal profession and the equal application of law for all citizens.”  

  • (OH)  The Racial Fairness Implementation Task Force is charged with developing an action plan for implementation of the Ohio Commission on Racial Fairness.  Topics under consideration include the perceptions of judges and attorneys, criminal sentencing, and interpreter services.  

  • (OR)  The Access to Justice Committee helps facilitate the Oregon Justice Department’s commitment to addressing issues of diversity throughout the system.  

  • (RI)  The Permanent Committee on Women and Minorities has undertaken a study to empirically determine the extent to which bias may exist especially in areas of arrests, convictions, and sentencing.

  • (NE)  The Supreme Court Gender Fairness Implementation Committee continues to work toward gender equity in the Nebraska court system. The membership of this committee includes representatives from the judiciary, court administration, bar, law schools, and lay persons.  During 2000, the Education subcommittee produced videotape addressing the impact of gender bias on the legal profession and judicial system.  The tape has been viewed at the Nebraska Bar Association meetings, judges' meetings, and county court employees' meetings. Other projects and accomplishments of the Committee include: reviewing legislation; monitoring appointments to the bench; adding a fast track process to be used for all complaints against judges that allege violations of workplace harassment; and additions to the Judges Bench Book regarding protection orders.

  • (NV)  The Female Offender Task Force recently established by the Director of the Nevada Department of Prisons (NDOP).  This is an initiative to look at a continuum of services and programs for the female offender within institutions, as well as pre- and post-incarceration.  

  • (SC)  As one follow-up step to the Citizens’ Summits, a 2000 Model/Demonstration Grant from the ABA Coalition for Justice and Committee on State Justice Initiatives has been awarded to develop increased training for the elimination of bias in the system.  

  • (KY) The Office of Minority Affairs and the judiciary will continue to systematically examine all policies and procedures to ensure that they do not operate to the detriment of any person on the basis of race, creed, religion, color, gender, sexual orientation, age, disability, marital status, or national origin.  

  • (MS)  The Mississippi Court has established a Task Force on Gender Fairness to study the issue in the court system and issue a report and recommendations.  

  • (UT)  The court Web site is being utilized to disseminate information such as the Report on Racial and Ethnic Fairness in the Legal System.  

  • (UT)  The Judiciary’s Committee on Fairness and Equal Access to Justice is working with the Office of the Defender General in the area of cognitive disabilities, to develop a resource of cognitive interpreters, and to examine and revise existing court forms to make them more accessible and understandable to all litigants.

Back to top

Diversity Outreach

  • (KY)  The Office of Minority Affairs is responsible for developing diversity outreach programs in Kentucky. The primary goal of the office is to create systematic change that will eliminate barriers, real or perceived, that exist between the court system and the public it serves. Public forums will help familiarize members of minority communities with the court process. Other new, creative, and engaging outreach initiatives will be designed to promote public trust and understanding of the courts by encouraging citizen participation in programs.  

  • (MN) East African Festival:  In Hennepin County, District Court judges and staff collaborated with PEACE (Parents of East Africans Common Efforts) to host the June 10, 2000 East African Festival in Minneapolis.  More than 2,000 people attended the festival of ethnic music, food, and art. The second annual festival was organized to promote cultural awareness and break down barriers between immigrants and the justice system.  

  • (MN)  Todd County District Court collaborated with county and local officials to establish the Todd County Community Hispanic Liaison Program. The program was initially established to provide interpreting services in court to Todd County’s rising Latino population.  It has grown to include a mentoring program for Latino youth, English and Spanish classes, a summer reading project, and other programs to promote improved cultural awareness.

Back to top

Commissions Studying Diversity

  • (MI)  A principal objective of the State Bar of Michigan’s Open Justice Commission is to implement the recommendations of the 1989 reports of the Michigan Supreme Court Task Forces on Racial/Ethnic Issues in the Courts and Gender Issues in the Courts.  The Task Forces concluded that the perception of bias adversely affects justice and that the perception often is based in reality.  The Commission has the potential, on behalf of under-represented groups, of expanding its reach to the larger issue of lack of public confidence in the courts.

  • (NE)  The Minority and Justice Task Force is a combined effort of the Nebraska Supreme Court and the State Bar Association to analyze the problems minorities encounter in the court system and legal profession.  The Minority and Justice Task Force is composed of thirty-three members from throughout Nebraska, including judges, attorneys, and members of many of Nebraska's minority communities. The project will examine issues of racial and ethnic fairness within four major areas including personnel and employment practices with the courts; access to the courts; civil, criminal and juvenile justice; and the legal profession.  

  • (AZ)  Citizens Summits were conducted throughout the state at which more than 500 people appeared and offered their views.  

  • (PA)  The Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Committee on Racial and Gender Bias in the Justice System began its work in earnest during 2000 and currently anticipates completion of its work during 2003.  Public hearings have been held or are scheduled throughout the state and smaller focus group sessions are also planned.  Work groups from throughout the state are collecting data and a major state-related university has agreed to provide statistical assistance in interpretation of data collected.  Additional research in specific areas of concern is planned, with consultants likely to undertake that research.   These activities are being coordinated with a variety of interested groups throughout the state, including several academic institutions.  

  • (UT)  The Judiciary’s Committee on Fairness and Equal Access to Justice, in partnership with the Executive Branch, held a Summit on Racial and Ethnic Diversity. The summit focused on barriers within the system to cultural understanding.  

  • (UT) The Racial and Ethnic Fairness Task Force, which included members of the non-lawyer community as well as judges and lawyers, completed a three-year study last fall and submitted its final report this year.  Fifteen hundred Utah residents shared their views and experiences at 27 public hearings across the state.  The Task Force debated and unanimously recommended over 75 proposals for changes in law enforcement, courts, and corrections in response to the hearings.  The full report is on the court Web site.  An Implementation Committee and a staff position were created to carry out the Task Force recommendations. In December 2000, the Judiciary’s Committee on Fairness and Equal Access to Justice, in partnership with the Executive Branch, held a Summit on Racial and Ethnic Diversity. The summit focused on barriers within the system to cultural understanding.

Back to top

Linguistic Outreach

  • (CA)  The court translated some of its ADA brochures and other Welcome to Your Court brochures into Spanish, Vietnamese, Korean, and Tagalog in order to address the needs of Orange County’s extremely diverse community (40% Hispanic, 10% Asian, and a significant Middle Eastern community).  

  • (DE)  Many forms have been translated into Spanish to assist the ever-increasing Spanish-speaking population.

  • (IA)  A goal of the Supreme Court is to ensure high quality language interpretation services in Iowa’s courts.  

  • (MA)  The Reinventing Justice Project has assisted in development of court specific brochures that have been translated into the languages of the community the courts serve.

  • (NE)  Spanish interpreters who serve Nebraska courts were provided training and testing during the year 2000.  The Nebraska Supreme Court belongs to a consortium for interpreter certification directed by the National Center for State Courts.  This 24-state consortium conducts standardized interpreting tests for court interpreters wishing to be certified.  In September, a two-day workshop was offered in Grand Island with the purpose of increasing professionalism of Spanish language interpreters.  In November 44 interpreters from across the state took an exam given by staff of the Administrative Office of the Courts with the hope of becoming certified under this program. The Court plans to develop similar programs for other languages in the future.  As those services are available, interpreters will be notified and invited to attend.  

  • (OR)  Efforts at improving access to justice for all citizens include the recent hiring of permanent staff for training, coordinating, and certifying language (including sign language) interpreters for the courts.  A considerable increase in the efforts of the Oregon Judicial Department to increase the number and quality of interpreters in several different languages is seen through the improvement of court hearings and other court proceedings.  Certification of court interpreters is a major effort to improve the quality of interpreting services provided to litigants.  

  • (RI)  Outreach and sensitivity to linguistic minorities spawned a Spanish language class for judges.  

  • (UT)  The Judiciary’s Committee on Fairness and Equal Access to Justice is also discussing the development of a program for language interpreters to assure minimum competency.  

  • (UT)  Interactive Voice Response (in English and Spanish) is available in all urban districts.

Back to top

National Center for State Courts
300 Newport Avenue
Williamsburg, VA 23185
Phone (800)616-6109 Fax (757)564-2022
Questions or Comments - email webmaster@ncsc.dni.us
Copyright © 2002 The National Center for State Courts. All Rights Reserved.