National Center for State Courts

 

Improving Justice through Leadership
and Service to the Courts

     
Search NCSC

Site Map | Disclaimer

  

Plain English Jury Instructions

Frequently Asked Questions

The Center for Jury Studies

RESPONSES

What are plain English jury instructions?

Plain English jury instructions are those given to the jury in simple, everyday language rather than more complex legalese.  They make an effort to be clear, concise, and effectual in conveying complicated legal ideas in normal English.

Top

What is the purpose of having plain English jury instructions?

The frustrations expressed by jurors during deliberations indicate a need to improve the clarity (and, thereby, the efficacy) of jury instructions.  Jury instructions are not intended to provide a crash course on governing legal principles so that duly educated jurors can engage in the same decision-making process as a well-trained judge.  Rather, jury instructions should present the factual issues to be decided and those legal rules the jury must use in deciding such issues.

Top

What are some possible procedures for using plain English jury instructions?

In order to create plain English jury instructions, the court carefully considers the message that the jury charge is intended to communicate.  Before trial, the trial judge requires the parties to identify two types of issues: those that are purely factual (“Was the traffic light red or green?”) and those that concern the application of relevant law (“Did the defendant breach his fiduciary duty?”).  Based upon these submissions, the trial judge prepares a working list of the issues.

The judge’s list of issues (factual and applicable law) serves as the basis for an outline of the jury instructions.  In practical terms, the outline is a table of contents that guides the parties in preparing proposed jury instructions that address the same issues.  In cases covered by pattern instructions, the outline will indicate which pattern instructions will be given and in what sequence, allowing more time to consider any deviations that might be appropriate.  The outline approach also will encourage the appellate courts to examine the propriety of the charge as a whole.  Currently, appellate courts tend to consider only whether specific instructions correctly state the governing law and pay little attention to shortcomings in the comprehensibility of the charge as a whole.  This procedure enables the trial judge to focus on the text of the individual proposed instructions.

Using a style manual for jury instructions can help the judge and attorneys draft instructions that: 

  • Avoid statements of legal principles;
  • Use language that is “case-specific” in terms of the parties and the evidence – e.g. “Mrs. Smith” and “the bus company” rather than “plaintiff” and “defendant”;
  • Organize the instructions according to a hierarchical checklist of the applicable legal tests and criteria, including descriptive headings and distinct subtopics to be addressed by the jury;
  • Summarize text that is important for guiding the jury through the instructions, even though this text may have no substantive legal content;
  • Include examples to illustrate the application of governing law;
  • Include a table of suggested “jury-friendly” terms and expression that might replace traditional legal jargon; and
  • Use consistent terminology throughout the instructions.

The judge’s use of a conversational tone and demeanor, written copies of instructions, modern communications technology (e.g., overhead projectors or video monitors), and appropriate visual aids (e.g., an outline of the charge, a summary of key points, or other graphic presentations) tends to improve juror comprehension.  The judge also should encourage jurors to ask questions about the instructions before they begin deliberating.  

If closing arguments follow the jury instructions, the trial attorneys display the precise text of the jury instructions and discuss the evidence in terms of the instructions.

Top

What are the advantages of plain English jury instructions?

Some advantages of plain English jury instructions include:

  • By preparing a working outline of disputed factual and legal issues, the judge and trial attorneys avoid the problem of jury charges that are a garbled patchwork of competing submissions by the opposing parties;
  • Greater attention to the overall structure and character of the charge minimizes redundancies, inconsistencies, and omissions in the instructions; and
  • Upgrading the quality of jury instructions encourages jurors to consider all of the issues, rather than mistakenly looking to isolated instructions as hit-or-miss guidance on what they are supposed to do.

Top

What are the disadvantages of plain English jury instructions?

Some disadvantages of plain English jury instructions include:

  • Formulating an outline of issues to be addressed in jury instructions requires the judge to dedicate additional time becoming familiar with the case before trial;

  • An outline of disputed factual and legal issues necessarily is subject to change during the course of the trial.  Some judges may be reluctant to make adjustments to instructions about issues that have been “already decided”; and

  • Deviations from approved pattern instructions or other jury instructions that have survived prior appeals create more potential grounds for appeal.

Top