Integrity
is a matter of perception as well as objective adherence to substantive and
procedural laws. Courts should be viewed as faithfully applying the
requirements of substantive and procedural laws. Practicing attorneys and
employees of the court are in a position to provide useful information about
the integrity of the court’s procedures. This information will be
collected in a survey administered to members of the bar and court
employees. The attorneys and court employees will be asked whether they are
aware of specific requirements of law not observed in the court. If they
are, they will be asked to cite underlying statutes or procedures as closely
as they can.
Planning/Preparation.
Different techniques will be used to select each set of
respondents. For the purpose of this measure, "court employee"
designates staff members of the clerk of court as well as persons employed
by the judges. A court employee payroll list is requested from the court
administrator and court clerk. The list should be annotated, using the most
expedient means possible, with each employee’s position and duties. In
some cases, the court’s personnel records may be organized in such a way
that no extra effort will be required for annotation. If this is not the
case, a system of codes will be provided to the court to make annotation as
simple as possible. One group of code values will indicate the kinds of
cases with which the employee is familiar; another will indicate the kinds
of duties the employee performs. For example, classification of duties will
include activities such as courtroom services, document processing at the
public counter, recording documents in docket records, managing records,
working with judgments and judgment dockets, scheduling matters for
calendars of court sessions, supervising probation, preparing pretrial
release evaluations and reports, conducting presentence investigations, and
handling cashier duties, cash bookkeeping or accounting, jury management,
and so forth.
The
court employee list will be used to identify employee respondents for the
survey. Part-time employees and maintenance staff should be excluded from
the sample group. Of those remaining, all employees should receive the
survey. (If some groups of employees performing similar duties are very
large, a sample of these groups could be drawn rather than sending the
questionnaire to all of the employees in each group.)
For
each division of the court included in the evaluation (i.e., general civil,
criminal, juvenile, domestic, and so forth), docket entries for cases filed
during the previous year is sampled, and a list of attorney names for all of
the sampled cases is compiled. Attorneys who practice often in the court are
likely to appear on the list more than once, and this frequency should be
noted. As a result, if the court chooses, it can sample according to the
attorneys’ degrees of practice.
Data
Collection. For examples of possible
questions to be used in data collection, refer to Form
3.1.2, Illustrative Questions for Measuring Court Employees’ and
Attorneys’ Assessments of Fidelity to the Law. The questionnaires for
court employees will be distributed via interoffice mail. The questionnaires
for attorneys should be mailed with a cover letter signed by the president
of the local bar association and the presiding judge of the local court.
Questionnaires
will be returned in sealed envelopes coded to match the "master"
list of individuals to whom questionnaires were given. Because the
respondents are employees of the court and attorneys who regularly practice
before the court, confidentiality is important, especially in smaller
jurisdictions where it may be relatively easy to determine the identity of
respondents to questionnaires. Care must be taken to avoid identifying
respondents by their handwriting or how they return the questionnaires.
Individuals
who return a questionnaire should be noted on the master list. When 10 days
have elapsed from the date respondents received the questionnaire, a
reminder should be sent to those individuals who have not yet returned a
questionnaire. A second notice should be sent after 10 days have elapsed. At
any time after 30 days, the data may be tabulated.
Data
Analysis and Report Preparation.
The laws listed by attorneys and employees should be compiled, noting the
frequency of each citation. The percentage of respondents who list one, two,
or three laws also should be calculated. For the purpose of measuring court
performance, the larger the percentage of respondents who believe that legal
requirements are not being followed, the lower the level of performance on
this measure. The results of this measure should be submitted, if possible,
to the panels described in Measure 3.1.1. The
panels should comment on the results and assist in drafting the evaluation
report to the court.