National Center for State Courts

 

Improving Justice through Leadership
and Service to the Courts

     

  

 
Logo
Search CJS website   |   Updated on          
Tagline
   
 
 
Who We Are What We Do State of the States Survey Jury Managers' Toolbox Jur-E Bulletin & Jury News Jurors & New Media Study
Contemporary Jury System Management and Trial Procedures
The NCSC Center for Jury Studie has more than 30 years experience advising state and federal courts on effective jury system management including summoning and qualification procedures, juror orientation, jury system automation, and jury trial practices.
contemporary jury system managementAn Overview of Contemporary Jury System Management (2011)   Jury NullificationJudicial Nullification? Judicial Compliance and Non-Compliance with Jury Improvement Efforts (2008)  
State of the States SurveyState-of-the-States Survey of Jury System Improvements (April 2007)   Juror Trial InnovationsJury Trial Innovations (2d ed, NCSC 2006)  
Jury System ManagementJury System Management (NCSC 2006)   Does Jury Size Matter?Does Jury Size Matter? A Review of the Literature (August 2004)  
Promise and Challenges of Jury System TechnologyPromise and Challenges of Jury System Technology (NCSC 2003)
Juror Utilization
Effective juror utilization minimizes the number of jurors who are not ultimately needed to select juries, thus conserving court resources and enhancing citizens' jury service experience.
Assessment of Jury OperationsAssessment of Jury Operations and Procedures for High Profile and Lengthy Trials in the Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada (Sept. 11, 2008)   Assessment of Juror UtilizationAssessment of Juror Utilization in the Massachusetts Trial Courts  
York County Court of Common Pleas Jury Utilization and Representation AssessmentYork County Court of Common Pleas Jury Utilization and Representation Assessment (Oct. 17, 2007)
  Assessment of Juror UtilizationAssessment of Juror Utilization in the Massachusetts Trial Courts  
2009 TrendsSaving Money For Everyone: The Current Economic Crisis is an Opportunity to Get Serious About Improving Juror Utilization
     
Fair Cross Section
The Center for Jury Studies has extensive experience evaluating demographic representation of the jury pool in state and federal courts and assisting courts to respond to challenges to the jury pool alleging violations of the Sixth Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Assessment of Jury Operations and Procedures for High Profile and Lengthy Trials in the Eighth Judicial District Court of NevadaAssessment of PWS System Effects on Random Selection of Jurors and the Demographic Characteristics of the Jury Pool in the Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County (Oct. 6, 2006)   Third Judicial Circuit of Michigan Jury System Assessment Third Judicial Circuit of Michigan Jury System Assessment (Aug. 2, 2006)  
Increasing the Jury PoolIncreasing the Jury Pool: the Impact of an Employer Tax Credit (2002)
  JMT Primer on Fair Cross Section JurisprudenceJury Managers’ Toolbox:
A Primer on Fair Cross Section Jurisprudence

 
Safe Harbors from Fair Cross Section Challenges? Safe Harbors from Fair Cross Section Challenges? The Practical Limitations of Measuring Representation in the Jury Pool
  Drake Law Review thumbnailSystematic Negligence In Jury Operations: Why The Definition of Systematic Exclusion In Fair Cross Section Claims Must Be Expanded
 
Voir Dire
An effective voir dire is one in which the judge and attorneys are able to solicit meaningful information from prospective jurors about their ability to serve fairly and impartially, and to do so in a reasonably efficient manner.
Building a Better Voir DireBuilding a Better Voir Dire (2008)   Examining Voir Dire in CaliforniaExamining Voir Dire in California (NCSC 2004)  
Managing Jury Selection EffectivelyManaging Jury Selection Effectively [curriculum materials] (NCSC 2007)
     
Juror Comprehension, Decision-Making, and Deliberations
The NCSC Center for Jury Studies has conducted extensive research on the impact of various trial innovations on juror comprehension, performance, and satisfaction as well as providing education and information to various judicial and bar organizations on this topic.
Are Hung Juries a Problem?Are Hung Juries a Problem? (NCSC 2002)   Why do Juries HangWhy do Juries Hang?  
Juror First Votes in Criminal Trials (2004)Juror First Votes in Criminal Trials (2004)   A profile of Hung JuriesA Profile of Hung Juries (2003)  
The Hung JuryThe Hung Jury: the American Jury’s Insights and Contemporary Understanding (2003)   A Jury of OneA Jury of One: Opinion Formation, Conformity, and Dissent on Juries (2008)  
Nullification at WorkNullification at Work? A Glimpse from the NCSC Study of Hung Juries (2003)   Judge-Jury Agreement in Criminal CasesJudge-Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: A Partial Replication of Kalven & Zeisel’s The American Jury (2004)  
Testing the effects of Selected Jury Trial InnovationsTesting the Effects of Selected Jury Trial Innovations on Juror Comprehension of Contested mtDNA Evidence (2004)   PErmitting Jury Discussions During Trial Permitting Jury Discussions During Trial: Impact of the Arizona Reform (2000)  
Timing of Opinion Formation by Jurors in Civl CasesTiming of Opinion Formation by Jurors in Civil Cases: An Empirical Examination (2000)   Speaking RightsSpeaking Rights: An Evaluation of Arizona’s Rule Permitting Juror Discussions (2002)  
Arizon Jury ReformThe Arizona Jury Reform Permitting Civil Jury Trial Discussions: the Views of Trial Participants, Judges, and Jurors (1999)
     
Juror Instructions
The NCSC Center for Jury Instructions convened the first national conference on pattern jury instructions in 2008.
Communicating with JurorsCommunicating with Jurors: How to Draft More Understandable Jury Instructions (2008)   Contemporary Pattern Jury Instruction CommitteesContemporary Pattern Jury Instruction Committees: A Snapshot of Current Operations and Possible Future Directions (April 2008)  
Notorious Trial Management
High profile trials are among the most difficult to manage. The NCSC Center for Jury Studies provides proven strategies for effective trial management.
Managing Notorious TrialsManaging Notorious Trials (1998)   Assessment of Jury OperationsAssessment of Jury Operations and Procedures for High Profile and Lengthy Trials in the Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada (Sept. 11, 2008)  
When all Eyes Are WatchingWhen All Eyes Are Watching: Trial Characteristics and Practices in Notorious Trials (2008)      
Juror Stress
Proven strategies to minimize juror stress.
Juror Stress Through the Eyes of the Juror: A Manual for Addressing Juror Stress (NCSC 1998)
     
Juror Ptivacy
A conceptual framework for courts to consider in reviewing policies and procedures on juror privacy.
Juror PrivacySafeguarding Juror Privacy: A New Framework for Court Policies and Procedures (2001)      
 
National Center for State Courts Contact Information | Email webster at: webmaster@ncsc.dni.us
Copyright © 2007 The National Center for State Courts. All Rights Reserved