This
measure surveys representatives of the media and court personnel to obtain
information about court practices when responding to media inquiries.
Designed to elicit open-ended responses, the survey is conducted in an
interview format, by telephone, or in person. Relatively small numbers of
interviews are required: a maximum of 20 in the largest courts and 6 to 10
in medium-sized courts (5 to 10 judges).
Planning/Preparation.
Court administrators identify representatives of the media and court
personnel for a survey about court practices. Representatives of the media
who interact with the court regularly and court employees who routinely
field or respond to media inquiries are identified. Court employees are
briefed by the court manager about the process so that they will cooperate
with the interviewer. If possible, two to three times as many court
employees should be identified and briefed than will be interviewed so that
any employee concerns about protecting anonymity can be satisfied. When this
is not possible, survey questions may need to be omitted or may not be
candidly answered (e.g., a question asking the employee to evaluate the
appropriateness of court policy).
In
all cases, the suggested survey forms (Forms
4.4.2a and 4.4.2b) should be reviewed and modified to fit specific local
circumstances while preserving the survey’s basic content requirements.
After
reviewing and revising the survey as necessary, the court should select an
interviewer who is not a court employee (see discussion of data collection
below).
Data
Collection. This
step should be completed by a designated research professional. However, it
is best to avoid the use of court personnel to conduct the interviews. The
interview is not especially complex or demanding and arrangements for
securing an interviewer might be made with professors or graduate students
at a local college. In smaller communities it may be possible to find an
appropriately qualified person who teaches journalism or political science
at a local high school. What is crucial is that the person be skilled at
placing people at ease, understand the importance of sticking closely with
the interview structure, and refrain from "leading" the
interviewee while eliciting responses. The person also must understand the
anonymity requirements and be able to judge how best to preserve them in
summarizing the results of the surveys.
The
surveys address the level of satisfaction with the court’s policy, the
faithfulness with which court policy is carried out, and satisfaction with
actual procedure or experience. Among the topics examined are: