This
measure provides information regarding the time it takes to process cases.
It compares the court’s processing times to local, State, or national
standards, and evaluates the degree of compliance with these standards. The
court’s case processing time is calculated from case processing
information collected from a random sample of cases disposed of during the
preceding year.
Planning/Preparation.
This measure requires careful coordination and
supervision. The investment in time and money required for completion
depends to a large extent on the court’s recordkeeping system. Courts with
automated systems may be able to provide much of the necessary data from
computer printouts. Courts with manual recordkeeping systems may need to
hire, train, and supervise individuals to collect data from case files. In
either case, data need to be gathered and analyzed.
The
first task is to identify general case categories. At a minimum, the court
should measure felony and general civil case dispositions. Misdemeanor,
domestic relations, juvenile, or other specialized case types may also be
measured using the same methodology. However, because these types of cases
may fall within the jurisdiction of limited or special jurisdiction courts,
they are not referred to specifically in this discussion.
A
felony case is one in which a formal indictment, information, or accusation
is filed against a defendant on any charge (or charges) defined as a felony
by State law. Count all charges in one indictment against one defendant as
one case. Count a case charged as a felony in the indictment or information
as a felony case for sampling purposes, even if the defendant is convicted
of a misdemeanor. Do not count probation violation alone as a felony case.
A
civil case is any action under civil law other than probate, domestic
relations, and small claims. Other cases that should be excluded from the
civil case sample include appeals from lower courts or administrative
agencies, petitions for amendment of orders or decrees, and any case type
that is nonlitigious in nature (e.g., name changes, registration of foreign
judgments, and transcripts of judgments).
The
second task is to compile a list of all cases of each type to be examined
that were disposed of in the prior reporting period. (This measure is
designed to correspond to the court’s yearly reporting cycle. In many
cases this will be a calendar year, but some courts operate on a July 1 to
June 30 reporting cycle.) The cases should be identified by docket number
and, if possible, by case caption.
Disposition
in felony cases is defined as the date on which a diversion, judgment of
guilt (guilty plea entered or verdict) or acquittal, nolle prosequi, or
dismissal of the case is entered regarding all (or the last of) the charges
against the defendant. For cases in which adjudication is formally withheld
in anticipation of dismissal (a type of diversion), the date on which
adjudication is formally withheld (the beginning of the diversion period)
should be considered the disposition date. Ideally, data collectors should
subtract the amount of time that a defendant was unavailable because he
failed to appear, resulting in the issuance of a bench warrant or capias.
Subtract the time from issuance of the bench warrant to his subsequent
rearrest.
In
civil cases not concluded by trial, a case is disposed of when a final order
is entered from a default or summary judgment, entry of settlement,
voluntary dismissal, or dismissal for lack of prosecution. In cases
concluded by trial, the date the verdict or judgment was entered can be
considered the disposition date. If a trial verdict is appealed and remanded
to the trial court, the case should be considered "reopened" for
purposes of determining case processing time (i.e., count from the date of
the remand to disposition). The following types of dispositions should be excluded:
transfer or removal to another jurisdiction, interlocutory appeal, and a
stay (e.g., pending bankruptcy).
The
next step is to select the samples of cases. If the court’s automated
information system can identify the case types targeted for examination and
can produce a list of random numbers, docket numbers can be selected
electronically. If the automated system does not have this capability or the
system is manual, an interval sample (e.g., every fifth case) must be
selected manually.
To
determine sample size, the following guide for each case type (civil,
criminal, etc.) should be used:
Total Dispositions for the Year
Minimum Sample Size
1,000
280
2,000
325
3,000
345
5,000
360
10,000
380
These
sample sizes should provide a sampling error of ±5 percent in 95 percent of
all samples.1 Expect to reject some sampled
cases because they are not the targeted case or disposition types or because
key data are missing. Thus, the initial sample should include about 10
percent more cases than the required minimum sample size.
After
the samples have been drawn, prepare the data collection forms. Forms
2.1.1a and 2.1.1c are generic data collection forms for civil and
criminal cases, respectively. Forms
2.1.1b and 2.1.1d are sample civil and criminal case code sheets. Items
on these forms may require modification to reflect the terminology used in
the jurisdiction (e.g., felony entries referring to "information or
indictment" may need to be changed to "accusation or true
bill"). The generic data collection forms capture the basic information
needed to identify cases and to calculate overall case disposition time as
well as time periods for intermediate case processing events. Items with an
asterisk are those required to calculate the time from case filing to
disposition. Additional data elements on the forms will give the court a
more refined picture of its case processing situation. To examine other
factors influencing timeliness in case processing, additional data elements
can be added to the forms (e.g., the number of plaintiffs or defendants, the
criminal defendant’s custody status, and the number of days in trial).
Before
data collection begins, prepare a coding manual to guide data collectors and
assure that data recording is consistent among cases and coders. For each
item on the coding sheet, the manual should describe what information is to
be collected, where it can be found in the data source (e.g., computer
printout, case file, docket sheet) and how it is to be recorded. Before data
collection begins, review this information with the data collectors.
Data
Collection.
During this step, data collectors record the appropriate case information on
the data collection forms. If the data collectors use a computer printout
with all the necessary data, this process may average as little as 3 or 4
minutes per case. If manual case files must be retrieved and reviewed to
acquire the necessary information, data collection may average as much as 15
minutes per case.
Data
Analysis and Report Preparation. After
gathering the data, compute the number of days from case filing (or arrest)
to disposition. (The most commonly used statistical software can
automatically calculate the number of days between two dates.) Summarize the
results by the number and percentage of cases disposed of within the
specified timeframes. Compare these results with local or State case
processing time standards. If the court has not adopted time standards, or
if the standards are ambiguous, compare the court’s case processing time
data with the time standards adopted by the American Bar Association (ABA)
or by the Conference of State Court Administrators (COSCA) and the
Conference of Chief Justices (CCJ), which are presented in figure 1. For
example, the ABA’s standards stipulate how long it should take for the
90th, 98th, and 100th percentile cases to be resolved. Consequently, they
provide a convenient way to evaluate court performance. The higher the
percentage of cases in compliance with the standards, the better the
court’s performance is on this measure.