NCSC: Institute for Court Management (ICM)

2009 CEDP Papers

In Phase III of the CEDP program, each student is required to prepare a comprehensive research paper evaluating a key court function or proposed activity in his or her home jurisdiction. We invite you to review the papers submitted by the 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 CEDP graduating classes. To access research papers, you must first obtain and install the Adobe Acrobat Reader.

If you are unable to access or download any research paper in its entirety in portable document format, please contact:

Knowledge Information Services
National Center for State Courts
Williamsburg, VA 23185-4147

Phone: 800.616.6164

2009

2008

TITLE	DOWNLOAD		DOWNLOAD
Assessing the Need and Feasibility of Expanding and Standardizing a Safety Protocol and Training Program for Probation Officers in South Dakota		Hispanic Representation in Jury Panels of the Superior Court of California, County of Orange is Unknown
A Critical Evaluation of Delay in an Ohio Criminal Trial Court		Integration of Police Scheduling Into Case Management Systems: Assessing the Impact
An Analysis of Felony Case Management in Two Rural Oregon Counties		Judicial Discretion in Cobb County Magistrate Bond Decisions
Access and Fairness in the Gila County Superior Court		Jurisdiction of The Proposed Nevada Court of Appeals
An Analysis of Criminal Felony Case Processing in Administrative Unit One, North Dakota		Planning for the Future: The Link between Caseload Growth and Rapid Population Increases
An Analysis of Foreign Language Interpreter Services Provided for the District Court in Cass County, North Dakota and Improvement Recommendations		Problem Solving Courts: Attitudes and Beliefs in Ohio
Analysis of Photo Speed Enforcement’s Impact on Arizona Limited Jurisdiction Courts		Public Perception of Access and Fairness of the Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County
Assessing the Need and Feasibility of an Employee Assistance Program (EAP) for South Dakota Court Employees		Public Perceptions of Access and Fairness in the Summit County Domestic Relations Court
CourTool 1: An Evaluation and Comparison of Access and Fairness in the Tempe Municipal Court		Strategies for Increasing the Interpreter Pool Using AOC Resources
Ensuring Meaningful Access to Appellate Review in Non-Criminal Cases Involving Self-Represented Litigants		The Purposes and Responsibilities of Courts: New Jersey’s Court Leaders Respond
Evaluation of the Pretrial Release Pilot Program in the Mesa Municipal Court		Toward Service Excellence: A Preliminary Assessment of Service Quality in Georgia Courts