Impact > Court Consulting Services

Court Consulting Services

NCSC's Court Consulting Services provides technical assistance and consulting services to all levels of courts nationwide. Projects can include short reviews and assessments of administrative policies and procedures, long-term studies and evaluations with policy recommendations, and direct assistance in setting up or modifying programs and services. The Court Consulting Services also helps courts find external sources of technical assistance.

2006 Projects - Court Consulting Services

  • British Columbia, Canada, Ministry of Attorney General, Development of a Public Accountability Framework
  • Ontario, Canada, Ministry of Attorney General, Justice of Peace Workload Assessment
  • Toronto, Canada (with PSTG Consulting) Courthouse Planning
  • PEW Charitable Trusts Grant to Support a National Judicial Leadership Summit on Children in Foster Care
  • United States Administrative Office of the Courts, Study of Federal Court System, (subcontractor to IBM)
  • Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, Records Management Study
  • Arizona Administrative Office of the Courts, Conduct Jury Training Session
  • Arizona Supreme Court, Assist with DUI Summit
  • Maricopa County, Arizona, Superior Court, Court Performance Measurement System
  • Mesa, Arizona, Municipal Court, Public Accountability Framework
  • Mesa, Arizona, Municipal Court, Court Space and Technology Consulting
  • Mohave County, Arizona, Justice Facility Needs Assessment
  • Pinal County, Arizona, Master Plan Judicial Space Planning Services with Durrant Architecture
  • Pinal County, Arizona, Long-term Court Strategic Plan
  • Yuma County, Arizona, Court Performance Measurement System
  • Arkansas Administrative Office of the Courts, Refine, Implement and Train on Performance Appraisal System
  • Job Classification System and Job Descriptions for Arkansas Supreme Court Clerk’s Office
  • California DUI/Drug Court Pilot Project Process Evaluation
  • California Performance and Staffing Standards in Guardianship
  • Kern County, California, Jail Overcrowding Study (subcontractor to Justice Concepts, Inc.)
  • Marin County, California, Superior Court, Court Performance Standards Training
  • Colorado State Court Administrative Office, Time Study
  • Colorado Judicial Department, Evaluation of Diversified Docket in 18th Judicial District
  • Colorado Administrative Office of the Courts, Parents Counsel Statewide Needs Assessment
  • Colorado Performance Audit of Probate Court Systems with Clifton Gunderson Accounting Firm
  • Connecticut Administrative Office of the Courts, Jury Selection Enhancement
  • District of Columbia Superior Court Juror Study
  • District of Columbia Superior Court Evaluation of Courts’ Social Services Programs
  • Brevard County, Florida, Comparative Analysis of Operations and Case Management
  • Florida 4th Judicial Circuit (Jacksonville), Caseflow Management Training
  • Orange County, Florida, Develop RFP for ICJIS Electronic Information Exchange System
  • Okaloosa County, Florida, Criminal Justice System Assessment Study
  • Georgia Administrative Office of the Courts ADA Study
  • Fulton County, Georgia, State Court, Personal Safety Courtroom Training
  • Savannah, Georgia, Review Information Technology
  • Guam Judicial Branch, Consulting on judicial evaluation, training, bench books, court interpreters and technology assessment
  • Lake County, Indiana, Operational Efficiency and Effectiveness Study with MAXIMUS
  • Kansas Judicial Branch, Court Security and Disaster Recovery Project
  • Wilson County, Kansas, 31st Judicial District, Courthouse Renovation Planning
  • 24th Judicial District Court, Louisiana, Jefferson Parish Courthouse Annex Renovation Consultation
  • Supreme Court of Louisiana, Performance Audit of Mandatory Continuing Legal Education
  • Maine Judicial Branch, Assist in the Development of Functional Requirements for an Automated Case Management System and a Strategic Information Task Implementation Plan
  • Maryland Administrative Office of the Courts, Security Assessment
  • Baltimore, Maryland, Analysis of Jury Process
  • Maryland Court of Appeals, Jury Reform
  • Maryland Office of the Public Defender Case Weighting Study
  • Maryland Administrative Office of the Courts, Update Judicial Workload
  • Massachusetts Office of Jury Commissioners, Evaluation of Jury Services
  • Massachusetts Administrative Office of the Trial Courts, Workload Study of Court Staff
  • Massachusetts Administrative Office of the Trial Courts, Records Management
  • Michigan Administrative Office of the Courts Develop Statewide Guidelines for Jury Management
  • Michigan Administrative Office of the Courts Examination of Juror Source List Problems
  • Missouri Ninth Judicial Circuit Court, Drug Court Evaluation
  • Montana Supreme Court, District Court Judicial Workload
  • Nebraska Judicial Workload Assessment of District, County, and Juvenile Courts
  • Facility & Technology Programming Services for UNLV Moot Court (with Rees Associates)
  • Reno, Nevada, Justice of the Peace Court, Review and Assessment of Salary Compensation for JPs
  • New Hampshire Administrative Office of the Courts, Judicial Workload Assessment
  • New Jersey Vicinage of Essex, Personal and Courtroom Safety Training for Judges
  • New Mexico Sentencing Commission, Workload Measures for Judges, DAs, and PDs
  • Study of Scheduling Practices for Driving While Intoxicated Cases in Bernalillo County, New Mexico
  • North Dakota Supreme Court, Process Evaluation and Development of Performance Measurement System
  • North Dakota Unified Judicial Branch, Analysis of Current Case Management System
  • Northeast Central Judicial District, North Dakota, Family Court Evaluation
  • Montgomery County, Ohio, Court of Common Pleas, Jury System Study
  • Urbana, Ohio, Municipal Court Salary Review
  • Salem, Oregon, Municipal Court, Operational Efficiency Study
  • First Judicial District of Pennsylvania, Jury Consultation Service
  • York County, Pennsylvania, Jury Management Study
  • York County, Pennsylvania, Operations Assessment of Clerk’s Office
  • Evaluation of the Rhode Island Family/Juvenile Drug Court Program
  • South Carolina Administrative Law Court Develop RFP for Case Management System
  • South Dakota, Meade County, Court Facility Planning
  • Collin County, Texas, Operational Assessment of Office of the District Clerk
  • Garland, Texas, Municipal Court Document Management Workflow for Case Management
  • Harris County, Texas, Review of Jury System Operations and Jury Management Facility Design
  • Harris County, Texas, Security Assessment
  • Houston, Texas, Municipal Court Facility Master Plan (subcontractor to Gensler & Associates)
  • Travis County, Texas, Assess Document Management System
  • Utah Staff Workload Assessment Update
  • Salt Lake City, Utah, Management Study of Salt Lake City Justice Court (subcontractor to Matrix)
  • Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles Needs Analysis for Utilizing Service-oriented Architecture for Accessing Virginia DUI Data
  • Chesterfield, Virginia, Alternative Court Scheduling Techniques
  • Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts, Assist in Search for Washington State Court Administrator
  • King County, Washington, District Court, Performance Measures Retreat
  • King County, Washington, District Court, Staffing Study
  • Snohomish County, Washington, Court Security Assessment Wisconsin Weighted Caseload Study
  • Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, Performance Evaluation of the Circuit Court
  • Wyoming CIP Reassessment