Contact:
Lorri Montgomery
Communications Manager
The National Center for State Courts
757.259.1525 or lmontgomery@ncsc.dni.us
National
Center for State Courts Responds
to the Effects of the Blakely Decision
Williamsburg,
VA (July 26,
2004) – In
response to ongoing uncertainty on how the recent Supreme Court
sentencing decision, Blakely v. Washington, affects the state
courts, the National Center for State Courts prepared a document that
analyzes this decision’s impact. It is available at www.ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/KIS_SentenBlakely.pdf.
In
Blakely, the high court struck down Washington state’s
sentencing method and ruled that any aggravating facts that would
increase a defendant’s sentence must be proven by a jury, not decided
by a judge. The decision reopened the constitutional debate on the
federal sentencing guidelines, and ignited questions about how it
affects sentencing by state court judges.
The
overriding question: Which state courts will be affected? NCSC
researchers found that most states will not be affected, but the more
similar a state’s guidelines are to the federal guidelines, the
greater the Blakely effect. A preliminary list of affected states
includes:
- Alaska
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- New
Mexico
- North
Carolina
- Ohio
- Oregon
- Tennessee
- Washington
The
exact number, however, is difficult to gauge because some implications
of the case are not yet clear, said Anne Skove, NCSC senior knowledge
management analyst who prepared the document. Areas of court management
and the legal process that might feel the effects the most include: plea
and charge bargaining, juries, and court budgets. Potential solutions
for states with Blakely issues include bifurcation, waiver,
voluntary (as opposed to mandatory) guidelines, and amending guidelines
to be less calibrated and with wider ranges.
The
National Center, headquartered in Williamsburg, Va., is a non-profit
court reform organization dedicated to improving the administration of
justice by providing leadership and service to the state courts. The
National Center, founded in 1971 by the Conference of Chief Justices and
Chief Justice of the United States Warren E. Burger, provides education,
training, and technology, management, and research services to the
nation’s state courts. The
National Center also is taking the lead on several key issues facing the
justice system. For example, it has established a major civil justice
initiative, a multi-year project that is examining best practices in
civil case management and how complex litigation procedures can be
improved. Other national initiatives being driven by the National Center
include judicial selection reform and increasing citizen participation
in jury service.
###
|